Samurai epic meets spaghetti western.

Presentation:

Whereas Harakiri is a stylish masterpiece, Yojimbo is more of a commercial epic designed to entertain as well as dazzle. The compositions are occasionally breathtaking though because the focus is on the story the film implements a lot of dialogue motivated cinematography. Because itโ€™s more mainstream, the tone is lighter and characters inevitably become more cartoonish compared to the emotional weight of Harakiri. I just didnโ€™t care as much for the characters in this film, though the plot is better paced with a rhythm that should retain more attention for younger audiences. The action sequences are fluid and more convincing than Harakiri, but I wouldnโ€™t say they are better choreographed. 

Conclusion:

Yojimbo is extremely impressive for its time, and you can see some parallels between this and Tarantinoโ€™s work. Thereโ€™s something about the presentation that seems to share the groundwork of classic westerns due to the standoffs, saloons, open town and lively gangsters. But because itโ€™s more mainstream I donโ€™t think it has the same timeless gravitas to prevent it from feeling somewhat outdated compared to action movies today. This is all because itโ€™s good enough to draw parallels to classic action movies to begin with. If you somehow didnโ€™t like Harakiri, this might meet expectations of what you found to be missing from a classic samurai film. 


Recommendations

Previous
Previous

High and Low (1963)

Next
Next

Harakiri (1962)