Juror #2 (2024)

If they made Law and Order into a movie.

Presentation:

Client Eastwood directs another film in his classic simplistic style. The grade is appropriately neutral for a courtroom drama with the only visual intrigue boiling down to anamorphic lenses and a conservative lighting style. The film looks and feels like a Law and Order episode without the dramatic music. Acting is amateurish by design, which you could argue makes for a more realistic legal drama but I would have liked to see more acting from Nicholas Hoult other than the same guilty bunny teeth face for the entire film. I think performances all around were pretty boring aside from Toni Collete. A painfully mediocre film with weak presentation and the only reason youโ€™ll persist is solely because of its interesting premise.

Conclusion:

Considering how good courtroom dramas can be, I donโ€™t see how anyone could consider this even in the same timezone as A Few Good Men or Anatomy of a Fall. Maybe itโ€™s good if you havenโ€™t watched those other films, but Iโ€™d rather watch 12 Angry Men again. Itโ€™s decent for sure and just interesting enough like Law and Order: SUV, but is probably more appropriately left on in the background TV while youโ€™re working on something else. Although some aspects are undramatized and boringly naturalistic, the plot does go someplace where you probably didnโ€™t expect it to go making it potentially worth the watch. However, the jury is still out whether itโ€™s worth your time.


Recommendations

Previous
Previous

Heretic (2024)

Next
Next

Megalopolis (2024)