In Cold Blood (1967)
A masterclass in cinematography.
Presentation:
Conrad Hall delivers one of the best shot films of all time, which is astoundingly consistent from start to finish. The score also starts off with a bang, tastefully intriguing but not too distracting especially toward the later half. Every frame is a painting utilizing foreground, middle and background. Lighting is dramatic with noir aspects but a tasteful contrast ratio, deep focus anamorphic and most importantly the framing is perfectly proportioned. Itโs no wonder this is one of Deakinโs favorite films. The image fidelity if you watch the Criterion version is also impeccable, youโd think it was made in this century if not recently. Without hyperbole, it frankly looks better than many films today simply because of how well each scene is framed and staged. Scott Wilson is a convincing psychopath and Robert Blake conveys complex instability. Their dialogue is cheeky but not too cartoonish and I believe elevates this true story into a cinematic experience. Itโs incredible once you learn of the true events this film is based on, which becomes even more enticing once you discover Robert Blakes scandals, mirroring this performance. But the highlight is definitely the cinematography. Despite not even being flashy, the gorgeous visuals even become distracting making it hard to pay attention to the story. Youโll wonder why people donโt use this kind of lighting today. You could learn a lot about cinematography by just watching this film and dissecting every frame. Youโll be blown away right from the beginning sequence yielding frame after frame of beautiful shots.
Conclusion:
If you wanted to understand what cinematography is, look no further. This is the essence of it, lighting, framing and camera movement. This film isnโt as widely known especially since it is naturally overshadowed by Kubrickโs era, but for those that are a fan of Roger Deakins, youโll see the similarities. If you know, you know. Itโs not in your face, but gorgeously composed with restraint and clarity. The cinematography is so good, it completely changes my criteria for the older black and white classics. A must watch for any students of cinematography, it genuinely competes with films today.
Recommendations
Global archeological adventure awaits!
The blade doesnโt cut deep for this Japanese epic.
Why science fiction should exist.
Pre-internet adventures of American adolescence.
When the story is more intriguing than the slashing.
Perhaps the best gangster epic of all time.
A philosophical odyssey venturing into our cosmic subconscious.
The pinnacle of classic cinema.
When Terrence Malick makes a film rather than a diary.
Catharsis for all the high school injustice.
A glimpse of what visual storytelling is all about.
An entertaining detective film noir mystery even by modern standards.
The alien movie that really started it all.
Spielberg makes a generation afraid of the beach.
Samurai epic meets spaghetti western.
An ambitious potential masterpiece falls short.
A historically relevant film in cinema on human bias.
Shakespearean downfall of a charismatic drug lord.
The Mozart effect applies to movies too.
A masterclass in cinematography.
A war thriller at the peak of the French wave.
Cinematography as sharp as samurai steel.
Nein out of ten.
You talking to me?
Perhaps the holy grail is the laughter we found along the way.
If there was ever the case for why classic films are more cinematic.
The father of horror/thrillers.
Crazy is never out of fashion.
Perhaps the vastest epic of all time.